- Saturday Morn - December 16, 2017

? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PDF or PBN format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Field strength:  Mean: 893 MP  Geomean: 355 MP
(based on 12 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
David Maddox - Patricia Maddox 60.00 1st OA 2.81
Keith Hedlund - Peter De Gregorio 57.00 2/3rd OA 1.85
Helen Rubin - Marion Keyworth 57.00 2/3rd OA 1.85
EVENT>Sat Morning Open Game    |SESSION>Saturday Morn|SECTION> O
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>December 16, 2017  |CLUB NO.>150680    | 12/16/2017 14:51
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Alan Hedegard   |RATING>Club ACBL Membership         |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   25.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/1500/300  |CLUB>H & H  Saturday
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=6/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
 1 Peter De Gregorio      Keith Hedlund            C  2/3   2/3    .   |  2/3   2/3    .     28.50  57.00  1.85(OA)
 2 Helen Rubin            Marion Keyworth          B  2/3   2/3    .   |  2/3   2/3    .     28.50  57.00  1.85(OA)
 3 Elizabeth Sebring      Richard Vreeland         C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     14.50  29.00
 4 Joan Roberts           Janet Hedlund            B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     25.50  51.00
 5 Patricia Maddox        David Maddox             C   1     1     .   |   1     1     1     30.00  60.00  2.81(OA)
 6 Elizabeth Nasr         Michel Nasr              A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     23.00  46.00
                                          Totals                                            150.00

Hands and Results
1 ♠T6
KT765
AQ5
♣Q42
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AKQ8754
2
862
♣AT
♠3
J83
JT74
♣KJ873
♠J92
AQ94
K93
♣965
11
136
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣1 ♦4 ♠1 NT1
EW: 2♣ 1 3♠  ♥5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.00   0.00  3♠ W      6  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        420    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      K  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
        450    0.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♠T  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 PassPassPass
1DblPass2
23PassPass
3All pass  

An unimpressive auction, but accurate! NS bid to the level of safety (4 doubled would be one too many).

An exuberant 4 opening bid is unnecessary, unilateral, and punishable!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

2 ♠Q9754
8
J63
♣7632
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J
KQ75432
872
♣J4
♠AT
AT6
AQ5
♣AKQT9
♠K8632
J9
KT94
♣85
3
723
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣0 ♦4 ♥0 NT0
EW: 7♣ 2 7 7NT  ♠5
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: -1520 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.00   0.00  3♣ E +3   T  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
       1010    1.00   1.00  6 W +1   ♠Q  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
       1020    0.00   2.00  6N E +1   ♣8  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  2Pass
2!1Pass2NT2Pass
43Pass4NTPass
5Pass5Pass
5NTPass7Pass
7NTAll pass  
  1. A positive heart response
  2. Unlimited balanced hand
  3. Really good hearts

East has a clear cut 2 opener for standard and 2/1 players. West has a promising hand and needs to apply the partnership's systemic bid to describe the nature of the hand. 2 might be the best for the simplicity, but there are those who would bid 3 or 4 (or even a transfer 4!) to describe the long fair heart suit with little outside. Some require more to bid a positive heart response (8 points and a five card or longer suit with two of the top three), and some play 2 as a double negative (despite my best efforts to persuade otherwise).

But the crux of the matter is later in the auction -- sooner or later, East will count an optimistic twelve tricks and hope for more. Then 4NT Roman Keycard Blackwood 1430 is wheeled out, and after the response of 5, showing one, 5 asks for the trump queen. Here is where West may express some optimism, with a 5NT bid, promising the trump queen and simultaneously suggesting an extra value without that extra's being a side suit king. Perhaps a side third round control or second round control, perhaps extra length. Here West has a singleton spade AND extra heart length.

East will expect the extra length and bid 7NT, counting tricks and extra chances. The J makes fifteen tricks solid.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

3 ♠-
KJ876
Q4
♣AQ9652
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QJ754
T532
T65
♣J
♠AT6
AQ
9873
♣KT43
♠K9832
94
AKJ2
♣87
12
413
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 2 1NT  ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2-NS/3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  3♣ E +1   A  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        500    1.00   1.00  5♣* N -3  ♠A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
       1100    0.00   2.00  6* N -5  ♠A  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   1
Pass2Pass2
Pass3Pass3NT
All pass   

Any suggestion that South should pass rather than open smacks of hindsight after a poor result. North is going to force any opening bid to game, and the adverse cards are just horribly placed for declarer. The luck of the opening lead may well be the main factor in determining the result on this board, for 3NT will surely be a popular contract, with varying results, mostly depressing for NS.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

4 ♠A943
QJT6
J96
♣65
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K
K853
AQT52
♣T72
♠Q6
7
K743
♣AQ9843
♠JT8752
A942
8
♣KJ
8
1211
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT3
EW: 4♣ 4 1NT  ♥5 ♠4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -130 4-EW/4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  2N E -2   ♠7  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  100          1.00   1.00  4 W -1   ♠A  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        130    0.00   2.00  4 W      Q  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
1Pass2Pass
2Pass3Pass
3Pass4Pass
5All pass  

What was good for the NS pair (bidding game) on board 3 is enticing as well for EW here, but equally unrewarding. Down one. Such bidding prowess!

But West has a reasonable opener and East has cause for optimism. Indeed, 5 would make pretty much assuredly if only the K were onside (one club goes away on a spade).

So far so bad for aggressive bidders.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

5 ♠AT87
872
K52
♣752
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ93
T6
T964
♣AJT
♠52
KJ54
AQ873
♣KQ
♠Q64
AQ93
J
♣98643
7
915
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 4 2 1♠ 3NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♣4  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
        110    1.00   1.00  2 W +1   ♣9  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        400    0.00   2.00  3N E      ♣3  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
 Pass1NTPass
2Pass2Pass
2NTPass3NTAll pass

Is it better for West to "Show" his four card spade suit by bidding 2, invitational? Or should 2 be an invitation denying spades but show a balanced hand? 2NT might well be used to invite while showing four spades, so that opener will always be declarer!

That scheme is commended for your consideration.

No matter here, for 3NT can be made, with the aid of the five card diamond suit, if properly negotiated.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

6 ♠986
Q72
A874
♣982
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQJT
T9
K
♣AQJ753
♠7542
AJ65
963
♣KT
♠A3
K843
QJT52
♣64
6
168
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT6
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   8  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        130    1.00   1.00  3♣ W +1   A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
        650    0.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣2  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O5-Maddox-Maddox

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
  PassPass
1Pass1Pass
1Pass2Pass
4All pass  

West has a nice hand, but the worthless K keeps him from jumping to 2 on the second round of bidding. However, East's raise suggests some worthwhile values, so West belatedly comes to life.

On the unlikely but effective lead of the A, game can be made despite the loss of two trumps and that diamond, thus: A, second diamond ruffed, A won to continue diamonds, tapping West. Now West can use his the last trump to pull two from the opponents, but look closely! North's 9 has been promoted into a sure trick.

West can overcome that inconvenience ONLY by crossing to a club honor in the East hand and then playing a trump, exhausting North's last. Then East can ruff a potential diamond continuation with the hand's last trump or win the A. In either case, West's clubs, East's lone trump, and the A take the remainder: Ten tricks.



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

7 ♠J82
-
Q9862
♣KT632
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AQT74
763
AK7
♣J9
♠K965
AKT8
53
♣Q74
♠3
QJ9542
JT4
♣A85
6
1412
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2 3/4♠ 3NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -620 4♠-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.00   0.00  2♠ W +2   8  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ W      6  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
        650    0.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣K  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O5-Maddox-Maddox

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
   2
2Pass4All pass

EW easily brush aside South's preemptive effort and make a very easy game with five spades, AK, AK, and a diamond ruff.

Too easy. Next!



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

8 ♠KQJ6
Q9
AJT2
♣964
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T532
T85
K4
♣AQJ5
♠87
AJ62
Q87653
♣2
♠A94
K743
9
♣KT873
13
107
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.00   0.00  1N S +1   ♠2  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
         50    1.00   1.00  3N N -1   ♣2  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        150    0.00   2.00  2N N -3   6  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O5-Maddox-Maddox

Craig Hemphill Hand Analysis
WestNorthEastSouth
Pass1Pass1
Pass1Pass1NT
PassPassPass 

South might think about playing spades, holding ruffing values in the diamond suit, but 1NT is just a tad more attractive because South lacks a fourth trump. With all of the clubs wrong, and diamonds pretty much wrong, spades would have worked out better, for eight tricks are available by simply ruffing diamonds..



****************************************
Comments? Questions?

CLICK HERE to submit a question or join the BridgeWinners.com board discussion.

CLICK HERE or email me directly at rcraigh@aol.com

9 ♠KT6
A62
AKT5
♣QJT
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AQJ7
QT753
Q763
♣-
♠9843
84
42
♣A8764
♠52
KJ9
J98
♣K9532
17
114
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3/4 1/2 3NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣3 ♦2/3 ♥5 ♠6 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          1.50   0.50  3N N +1   ♣6  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
  430          1.50   0.50  3N N +1   ♣3  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
  150          0.00   2.00  1N N +2   ♣6  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
10 ♠T6
KQT852
A4
♣AK2
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠K4
9764
K92
♣8643
♠A92
J
Q863
♣QJT75
♠QJ8753
A3
JT75
♣9
16
610
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 4 4♠ 3NT  ♣5
EW: 2♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          1.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   9  O4-Roberts-Hedlund vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
  650          1.50   0.50  4 N +1   ♠7  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
  600          0.00   2.00  3N N      ♣Q  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
11 ♠QJT
KJT654
T
♣K76
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠763
AQ9
A9762
♣95
♠K842
3
Q84
♣AQ843
♠A95
872
KJ53
♣JT2
10
1011
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5/4 ♦3 ♠4 NT6
EW: 2♣ 4/3 2♠ 1NT  ♥5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -130 4-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  3♣ E -3   8  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
         50    0.50   1.50  4 N -1   ♠2  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
         50    0.50   1.50  3 N -1   4  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
12 ♠QT54
A98
Q8
♣T976
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AK
KJ764
97
♣J852
♠J9632
T53
AT4
♣AK
♠87
Q2
KJ6532
♣Q43
8
1212
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4
EW: 2♣ 1 4 3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.00   0.00  3N E -3   6  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
   50          1.00   1.00  4 W -1   ♠4  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        450    0.00   2.00  5 W      ♠5  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
13 ♠AQ7
A532
Q2
♣QJ53
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠T2
6
JT54
♣AT7642
♠8643
KQ97
A987
♣8
♠KJ95
JT84
K63
♣K9
15
59
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/-♣ 2 2♠ 3/2NT
       ♣7/6 ♦5
EW: 1  ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +600 3NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          2.00   0.00  3N N      7  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
  180          1.00   1.00  2N N +2   7  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
        200    0.00   2.00  4 N -2   ♠6  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
14 ♠K74
A765
J72
♣KT2
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠9862
K
QT98
♣9864
♠A53
J9432
3
♣AQ73
♠QJT
QT8
AK654
♣J5
11
511
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2/1 2NT  ♣5 ♠6
EW: 2♣  ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  1 E -1   A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
         50    0.50   1.50  2N N -1   ♠3  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
         50    0.50   1.50  3 S -1   K  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
15 ♠AK76
JT984
J
♣765
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠9832
63
A982
♣A83
♠QT5
AK5
K63
♣KJT2
♠J4
Q72
QT754
♣Q94
9
816
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 3 1 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2 S      A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O3-Sebring-Vreeland
   50          1.00   1.00  3N E -1   5  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
        400    0.00   2.00  3N E      5  O5-Maddox-Maddox vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
16 ♠Q
5
A9642
♣AQ8643
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠743
T87643
KT73
♣-
♠AKT982
AK2
Q8
♣72
♠J65
QJ9
J5
♣KJT95
12
316
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 2NT  ♥3 ♠2
EW: 4 5♠  ♣3 ♦5 NT5
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: -300 6♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.00   0.00  5♣ N      A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
        100    0.50   1.50  6♣ S -2   ♠7  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
        100    0.50   1.50  5♣* N -1  ♠A  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
17 ♠62
J965
AJ
♣T9842
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AJT43
AK
86
♣J763
♠K85
Q842
K92
♣AK5
♠Q97
T73
QT7543
♣Q
6
1315
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT1
EW: 4♣ 2 5 6♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -990 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    1.50   0.50  5♠ E      ♣Q  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
        450    1.50   0.50  4♠ E +1   ♣Q  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
        480    0.00   2.00  4♠ E +2   ♣Q  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
18 ♠Q2
KT8642
-
♣KT543
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠-
AQ97
AKQ752
♣972
♠K9753
5
9843
♣AQ8
♠AJT864
J3
JT6
♣J6
8
159
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣4/5 ♦2 ♠6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 5 1♠ 3NT  ♥5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -400 3NT-EW/5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.50   0.50  3N W -1   T  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
   50          1.50   0.50  5 W -1   ♠Q  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
        130    0.00   2.00  3 W +1   ♠Q  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
19 ♠KT
AK8763
KT9
♣QT
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠87654
J54
6
♣AJ86
♠A932
92
Q53
♣9743
♠QJ
QT
AJ8742
♣K52
15
66
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 5 5NT  ♣6 ♠6
EW: 1♣  ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +460 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          1.50   0.50  4 N +1   ♣9  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
  450          1.50   0.50  4 N +1   ♣7  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
  420          0.00   2.00  4 N      ♣3  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
20 ♠AJ76532
JT
9
♣K72
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T984
AQ3
K843
♣J9
♠K
4
QJT652
♣QT843
♠Q
K987652
A7
♣A65
9
108
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/5 3♠  ♣5 ♦3/4 NT6
EW: 1♣ 3 1NT  ♥2 ♠4
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: +650 5-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.00   0.00  4 S +1   3  O2-Rubin-Keyworth vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
        200    0.50   1.50  5* S -1  K  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund
        200    0.50   1.50  5* S -1  K  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
21 ♠T
K63
K3
♣KQT9763
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠K94
AQJ874
AT
♣J4
♠7532
2
8762
♣A852
♠AQJ86
T95
QJ954
♣-
11
154
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1 1♠  NT6
EW:  ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +90 2-NS/2♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          2.00   0.00  4* W -4  ♠T  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
        300    1.00   1.00  3N N -3   2  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
        400    0.00   2.00  4♣ N -4   2  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
22 ♠T
AQJT75
Q
♣A8742
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AQ76
8
J7632
♣KJT
♠842
K642
K8
♣Q653
♠KJ953
93
AT954
♣9
13
118
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 3 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   0.00  4 N      ♠8  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
  110          1.00   1.00  2 N      ♠4  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
         50    0.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♠8  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
23 ♠JT82
K6
KJ973
♣76
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠95
QT74
AT84
♣852
♠KQ7643
852
-
♣AJ43
♠A
AJ93
Q652
♣KQT9
8
610
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 5 2 1/-♠ 3NT  ♠7/6
EW:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +600 3NT-NS/5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   0.00  3N S +1   4  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
  130          1.00   1.00  2 S +2   4  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
        200    0.00   2.00  2N N -2   ♠6  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
24 ♠7
T54
AT9832
♣942
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KQT6
KQ6
7
♣A8763
♠98
A873
J65
♣KQT5
♠AJ5432
J92
KQ4
♣J
4
1410
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣1 ♥3 ♠6 NT4
EW: 4♣ 4 1♠  ♦5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  2♣ W +2   ♠7  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
        800    0.50   1.50  4♠* S -4  K  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
        800    0.50   1.50  3♠* S -4  K  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Maddox-Maddox
25 ♠8
543
T9753
♣JT65
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AT532
AKQT7
2
♣72
♠QJ6
86
KJ84
♣K943
♠K974
J92
AQ6
♣AQ8
1
1310
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♥3/4 ♠3/4 NT4
EW: 1/-♣ 3 3♠ 3/2NT
       ♣7/6 ♦6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -500 4*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          1.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   ♣T  O3-Sebring-Vreeland vs O2-Rubin-Keyworth
  100          1.50   0.50  3♠ W -1   3  O1-De Gregorio-Hedlund vs O4-Roberts-Hedlund
        150    0.00   2.00  4 S -3   A  O6-Nasr-Nasr vs O5-Maddox-Maddox